diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'gnu/packages/patches/glibc-2.29-git-updates.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | gnu/packages/patches/glibc-2.29-git-updates.patch | 742 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 742 deletions
diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/glibc-2.29-git-updates.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/glibc-2.29-git-updates.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 5750e9cac1..0000000000 --- a/gnu/packages/patches/glibc-2.29-git-updates.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,742 +0,0 @@ -This file tracks updates from the "release/2.29/master" branch: -https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release/2.29/master - -Abridged commits are appended to this file. - -From ec894251ef11723d10df04fcfd7bd2030c6e43ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> -Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 22:50:12 -0500 -Subject: [PATCH] nptl: Fix pthread_rwlock_try*lock stalls (Bug 23844) -diff --git a/nptl/pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock.c b/nptl/pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock.c -index 368862ff07..2f94f17f36 100644 ---- a/nptl/pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock.c -+++ b/nptl/pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock.c -@@ -94,15 +94,22 @@ __pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock (pthread_rwlock_t *rwlock) - /* Same as in __pthread_rwlock_rdlock_full: - We started the read phase, so we are also responsible for - updating the write-phase futex. Relaxed MO is sufficient. -- Note that there can be no other reader that we have to wake -- because all other readers will see the read phase started by us -- (or they will try to start it themselves); if a writer started -- the read phase, we cannot have started it. Furthermore, we -- cannot discard a PTHREAD_RWLOCK_FUTEX_USED flag because we will -- overwrite the value set by the most recent writer (or the readers -- before it in case of explicit hand-over) and we know that there -- are no waiting readers. */ -- atomic_store_relaxed (&rwlock->__data.__wrphase_futex, 0); -+ We have to do the same steps as a writer would when handing over the -+ read phase to use because other readers cannot distinguish between -+ us and the writer. -+ Note that __pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock callers will not have to be -+ woken up because they will either see the read phase started by us -+ or they will try to start it themselves; however, callers of -+ __pthread_rwlock_rdlock_full just increase the reader count and then -+ check what state the lock is in, so they cannot distinguish between -+ us and a writer that acquired and released the lock in the -+ meantime. */ -+ if ((atomic_exchange_relaxed (&rwlock->__data.__wrphase_futex, 0) -+ & PTHREAD_RWLOCK_FUTEX_USED) != 0) -+ { -+ int private = __pthread_rwlock_get_private (rwlock); -+ futex_wake (&rwlock->__data.__wrphase_futex, INT_MAX, private); -+ } - } - - return 0; -diff --git a/nptl/pthread_rwlock_trywrlock.c b/nptl/pthread_rwlock_trywrlock.c -index fd37a71ce4..fae475cc70 100644 ---- a/nptl/pthread_rwlock_trywrlock.c -+++ b/nptl/pthread_rwlock_trywrlock.c -@@ -46,8 +46,15 @@ __pthread_rwlock_trywrlock (pthread_rwlock_t *rwlock) - &rwlock->__data.__readers, &r, - r | PTHREAD_RWLOCK_WRPHASE | PTHREAD_RWLOCK_WRLOCKED)) - { -+ /* We have become the primary writer and we cannot have shared -+ the PTHREAD_RWLOCK_FUTEX_USED flag with someone else, so we -+ can simply enable blocking (see full wrlock code). */ - atomic_store_relaxed (&rwlock->__data.__writers_futex, 1); -- atomic_store_relaxed (&rwlock->__data.__wrphase_futex, 1); -+ /* If we started a write phase, we need to enable readers to -+ wait. If we did not, we must not change it because other threads -+ may have set the PTHREAD_RWLOCK_FUTEX_USED in the meantime. */ -+ if ((r & PTHREAD_RWLOCK_WRPHASE) == 0) -+ atomic_store_relaxed (&rwlock->__data.__wrphase_futex, 1); - atomic_store_relaxed (&rwlock->__data.__cur_writer, - THREAD_GETMEM (THREAD_SELF, tid)); - return 0; -diff --git a/support/Makefile b/support/Makefile -index 432cf2fe6c..c15b93647c 100644 ---- a/support/Makefile -+++ b/support/Makefile -@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ libsupport-routines = \ - xpthread_mutexattr_settype \ - xpthread_once \ - xpthread_rwlock_init \ -+ xpthread_rwlock_destroy \ - xpthread_rwlock_rdlock \ - xpthread_rwlock_unlock \ - xpthread_rwlock_wrlock \ -diff --git a/support/xpthread_rwlock_destroy.c b/support/xpthread_rwlock_destroy.c -new file mode 100644 -index 0000000000..6d6e953569 ---- /dev/null -+++ b/support/xpthread_rwlock_destroy.c -@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ -+/* pthread_rwlock_destroy with error checking. -+ Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -+ This file is part of the GNU C Library. -+ -+ The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or -+ modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public -+ License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either -+ version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. -+ -+ The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, -+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of -+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU -+ Lesser General Public License for more details. -+ -+ You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public -+ License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see -+ <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ -+ -+#include <support/xthread.h> -+ -+void -+xpthread_rwlock_destroy (pthread_rwlock_t *rwlock) -+{ -+ xpthread_check_return ("pthread_rwlock_destroy", -+ pthread_rwlock_destroy (rwlock)); -+} -diff --git a/support/xthread.h b/support/xthread.h -index 47c23235f3..9fe1f68b3b 100644 ---- a/support/xthread.h -+++ b/support/xthread.h -@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ void xpthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np (pthread_rwlockattr_t *attr, int pref); - void xpthread_rwlock_wrlock (pthread_rwlock_t *rwlock); - void xpthread_rwlock_rdlock (pthread_rwlock_t *rwlock); - void xpthread_rwlock_unlock (pthread_rwlock_t *rwlock); -+void xpthread_rwlock_destroy (pthread_rwlock_t *rwlock); - - __END_DECLS - -From 44113a8ba24af23d7bbb174f9087a6b83a76289a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com> -Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:18:36 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] Add compiler barriers around modifications of the robust - mutex list for pthread_mutex_trylock. [BZ #24180] -diff --git a/nptl/pthread_mutex_trylock.c b/nptl/pthread_mutex_trylock.c -index 8fe43b8f0f..bf2869eca2 100644 ---- a/nptl/pthread_mutex_trylock.c -+++ b/nptl/pthread_mutex_trylock.c -@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ __pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex) - case PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_ADAPTIVE_NP: - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, - &mutex->__data.__list.__next); -+ /* We need to set op_pending before starting the operation. Also -+ see comments at ENQUEUE_MUTEX. */ -+ __asm ("" ::: "memory"); - - oldval = mutex->__data.__lock; - do -@@ -119,7 +122,12 @@ __pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex) - /* But it is inconsistent unless marked otherwise. */ - mutex->__data.__owner = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INCONSISTENT; - -+ /* We must not enqueue the mutex before we have acquired it. -+ Also see comments at ENQUEUE_MUTEX. */ -+ __asm ("" ::: "memory"); - ENQUEUE_MUTEX (mutex); -+ /* We need to clear op_pending after we enqueue the mutex. */ -+ __asm ("" ::: "memory"); - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); - - /* Note that we deliberately exist here. If we fall -@@ -135,6 +143,8 @@ __pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex) - int kind = PTHREAD_MUTEX_TYPE (mutex); - if (kind == PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_ERRORCHECK_NP) - { -+ /* We do not need to ensure ordering wrt another memory -+ access. Also see comments at ENQUEUE_MUTEX. */ - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, - NULL); - return EDEADLK; -@@ -142,6 +152,8 @@ __pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex) - - if (kind == PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_RECURSIVE_NP) - { -+ /* We do not need to ensure ordering wrt another memory -+ access. */ - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, - NULL); - -@@ -160,6 +172,9 @@ __pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex) - id, 0); - if (oldval != 0 && (oldval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) == 0) - { -+ /* We haven't acquired the lock as it is already acquired by -+ another owner. We do not need to ensure ordering wrt another -+ memory access. */ - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); - - return EBUSY; -@@ -173,13 +188,20 @@ __pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex) - if (oldval == id) - lll_unlock (mutex->__data.__lock, - PTHREAD_ROBUST_MUTEX_PSHARED (mutex)); -+ /* FIXME This violates the mutex destruction requirements. See -+ __pthread_mutex_unlock_full. */ - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); - return ENOTRECOVERABLE; - } - } - while ((oldval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) != 0); - -+ /* We must not enqueue the mutex before we have acquired it. -+ Also see comments at ENQUEUE_MUTEX. */ -+ __asm ("" ::: "memory"); - ENQUEUE_MUTEX (mutex); -+ /* We need to clear op_pending after we enqueue the mutex. */ -+ __asm ("" ::: "memory"); - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); - - mutex->__data.__owner = id; -@@ -211,10 +233,15 @@ __pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex) - } - - if (robust) -- /* Note: robust PI futexes are signaled by setting bit 0. */ -- THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, -- (void *) (((uintptr_t) &mutex->__data.__list.__next) -- | 1)); -+ { -+ /* Note: robust PI futexes are signaled by setting bit 0. */ -+ THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, -+ (void *) (((uintptr_t) &mutex->__data.__list.__next) -+ | 1)); -+ /* We need to set op_pending before starting the operation. Also -+ see comments at ENQUEUE_MUTEX. */ -+ __asm ("" ::: "memory"); -+ } - - oldval = mutex->__data.__lock; - -@@ -223,12 +250,16 @@ __pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex) - { - if (kind == PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK_NP) - { -+ /* We do not need to ensure ordering wrt another memory -+ access. */ - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); - return EDEADLK; - } - - if (kind == PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP) - { -+ /* We do not need to ensure ordering wrt another memory -+ access. */ - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); - - /* Just bump the counter. */ -@@ -250,6 +281,9 @@ __pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex) - { - if ((oldval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) == 0) - { -+ /* We haven't acquired the lock as it is already acquired by -+ another owner. We do not need to ensure ordering wrt another -+ memory access. */ - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); - - return EBUSY; -@@ -270,6 +304,9 @@ __pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex) - if (INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P (e, __err) - && INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (e, __err) == EWOULDBLOCK) - { -+ /* The kernel has not yet finished the mutex owner death. -+ We do not need to ensure ordering wrt another memory -+ access. */ - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); - - return EBUSY; -@@ -287,7 +324,12 @@ __pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex) - /* But it is inconsistent unless marked otherwise. */ - mutex->__data.__owner = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INCONSISTENT; - -+ /* We must not enqueue the mutex before we have acquired it. -+ Also see comments at ENQUEUE_MUTEX. */ -+ __asm ("" ::: "memory"); - ENQUEUE_MUTEX (mutex); -+ /* We need to clear op_pending after we enqueue the mutex. */ -+ __asm ("" ::: "memory"); - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); - - /* Note that we deliberately exit here. If we fall -@@ -310,13 +352,20 @@ __pthread_mutex_trylock (pthread_mutex_t *mutex) - PTHREAD_ROBUST_MUTEX_PSHARED (mutex)), - 0, 0); - -+ /* To the kernel, this will be visible after the kernel has -+ acquired the mutex in the syscall. */ - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); - return ENOTRECOVERABLE; - } - - if (robust) - { -+ /* We must not enqueue the mutex before we have acquired it. -+ Also see comments at ENQUEUE_MUTEX. */ -+ __asm ("" ::: "memory"); - ENQUEUE_MUTEX_PI (mutex); -+ /* We need to clear op_pending after we enqueue the mutex. */ -+ __asm ("" ::: "memory"); - THREAD_SETMEM (THREAD_SELF, robust_head.list_op_pending, NULL); - } - -From c096b008d2671028c21ac8cf01f18a2083e73c44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> -Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:54:41 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] nptl: Avoid fork handler lock for async-signal-safe fork [BZ - #24161] ---- a/nptl/register-atfork.c -+++ b/nptl/register-atfork.c -@@ -107,13 +107,14 @@ __unregister_atfork (void *dso_handle) - } - - void --__run_fork_handlers (enum __run_fork_handler_type who) -+__run_fork_handlers (enum __run_fork_handler_type who, _Bool do_locking) - { - struct fork_handler *runp; - - if (who == atfork_run_prepare) - { -- lll_lock (atfork_lock, LLL_PRIVATE); -+ if (do_locking) -+ lll_lock (atfork_lock, LLL_PRIVATE); - size_t sl = fork_handler_list_size (&fork_handlers); - for (size_t i = sl; i > 0; i--) - { -@@ -133,7 +134,8 @@ __run_fork_handlers (enum __run_fork_handler_type who) - else if (who == atfork_run_parent && runp->parent_handler) - runp->parent_handler (); - } -- lll_unlock (atfork_lock, LLL_PRIVATE); -+ if (do_locking) -+ lll_unlock (atfork_lock, LLL_PRIVATE); - } - } - -diff --git a/sysdeps/nptl/fork.c b/sysdeps/nptl/fork.c -index bd68f18b45..14b69a6f89 100644 ---- a/sysdeps/nptl/fork.c -+++ b/sysdeps/nptl/fork.c -@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ __libc_fork (void) - but our current fork implementation is not. */ - bool multiple_threads = THREAD_GETMEM (THREAD_SELF, header.multiple_threads); - -- __run_fork_handlers (atfork_run_prepare); -+ __run_fork_handlers (atfork_run_prepare, multiple_threads); - - /* If we are not running multiple threads, we do not have to - preserve lock state. If fork runs from a signal handler, only -@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ __libc_fork (void) - __rtld_lock_initialize (GL(dl_load_lock)); - - /* Run the handlers registered for the child. */ -- __run_fork_handlers (atfork_run_child); -+ __run_fork_handlers (atfork_run_child, multiple_threads); - } - else - { -@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ __libc_fork (void) - } - - /* Run the handlers registered for the parent. */ -- __run_fork_handlers (atfork_run_parent); -+ __run_fork_handlers (atfork_run_parent, multiple_threads); - } - - return pid; -diff --git a/sysdeps/nptl/fork.h b/sysdeps/nptl/fork.h -index a1c3b26b68..99ed76034b 100644 ---- a/sysdeps/nptl/fork.h -+++ b/sysdeps/nptl/fork.h -@@ -52,10 +52,12 @@ enum __run_fork_handler_type - - atfork_run_child: run all the CHILD_HANDLER and unlocks the internal - lock. - - atfork_run_parent: run all the PARENT_HANDLER and unlocks the internal -- lock. */ --extern void __run_fork_handlers (enum __run_fork_handler_type who) -- attribute_hidden; -+ lock. -+ -+ Perform locking only if DO_LOCKING. */ -+extern void __run_fork_handlers (enum __run_fork_handler_type who, -+ _Bool do_locking) attribute_hidden; - - /* C library side function to register new fork handlers. */ - extern int __register_atfork (void (*__prepare) (void), - -From 067fc32968b601493f4b247a3ac00caeea3f3d61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> -Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 21:27:01 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] nptl: Fix invalid Systemtap probe in pthread_join [BZ #24211] -diff --git a/nptl/pthread_join_common.c b/nptl/pthread_join_common.c -index ecb78ffba5..366feb376b 100644 ---- a/nptl/pthread_join_common.c -+++ b/nptl/pthread_join_common.c -@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ __pthread_timedjoin_ex (pthread_t threadid, void **thread_return, - pthread_cleanup_pop (0); - } - -+ void *pd_result = pd->result; - if (__glibc_likely (result == 0)) - { - /* We mark the thread as terminated and as joined. */ -@@ -93,7 +94,7 @@ __pthread_timedjoin_ex (pthread_t threadid, void **thread_return, - - /* Store the return value if the caller is interested. */ - if (thread_return != NULL) -- *thread_return = pd->result; -+ *thread_return = pd_result; - - /* Free the TCB. */ - __free_tcb (pd); -@@ -101,7 +102,7 @@ __pthread_timedjoin_ex (pthread_t threadid, void **thread_return, - else - pd->joinid = NULL; - -- LIBC_PROBE (pthread_join_ret, 3, threadid, result, pd->result); -+ LIBC_PROBE (pthread_join_ret, 3, threadid, result, pd_result); - - return result; - } - -From bc6f839fb4066be83272c735e662850af2595777 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com> -Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:45:35 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] Fix output of LD_SHOW_AUXV=1. -diff --git a/elf/dl-sysdep.c b/elf/dl-sysdep.c -index 5f6c679a3f..5d19b100b2 100644 ---- a/elf/dl-sysdep.c -+++ b/elf/dl-sysdep.c -@@ -328,14 +328,9 @@ _dl_show_auxv (void) - assert (AT_NULL == 0); - assert (AT_IGNORE == 1); - -- if (av->a_type == AT_HWCAP || av->a_type == AT_HWCAP2 -- || AT_L1I_CACHEGEOMETRY || AT_L1D_CACHEGEOMETRY -- || AT_L2_CACHEGEOMETRY || AT_L3_CACHEGEOMETRY) -- { -- /* These are handled in a special way per platform. */ -- if (_dl_procinfo (av->a_type, av->a_un.a_val) == 0) -- continue; -- } -+ /* Some entries are handled in a special way per platform. */ -+ if (_dl_procinfo (av->a_type, av->a_un.a_val) == 0) -+ continue; - - if (idx < sizeof (auxvars) / sizeof (auxvars[0]) - && auxvars[idx].form != unknown) -diff --git a/sysdeps/powerpc/dl-procinfo.h b/sysdeps/powerpc/dl-procinfo.h -index f542f7318f..dfc3b33a72 100644 ---- a/sysdeps/powerpc/dl-procinfo.h -+++ b/sysdeps/powerpc/dl-procinfo.h -@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ _dl_procinfo (unsigned int type, unsigned long int word) - break; - } - default: -- /* This should not happen. */ -+ /* Fallback to generic output mechanism. */ - return -1; - } - _dl_printf ("\n"); -diff --git a/sysdeps/sparc/dl-procinfo.h b/sysdeps/sparc/dl-procinfo.h -index 282b8c5117..64ee267fc7 100644 ---- a/sysdeps/sparc/dl-procinfo.h -+++ b/sysdeps/sparc/dl-procinfo.h -@@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ _dl_procinfo (unsigned int type, unsigned long int word) - { - int i; - -- /* Fallback to unknown output mechanism. */ -- if (type == AT_HWCAP2) -+ /* Fallback to generic output mechanism. */ -+ if (type != AT_HWCAP) - return -1; - - _dl_printf ("AT_HWCAP: "); -diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/dl-procinfo.h b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/dl-procinfo.h -index 66c00297b7..05c62c8687 100644 ---- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/dl-procinfo.h -+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/dl-procinfo.h -@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ _dl_procinfo (unsigned int type, unsigned long int word) - break; - } - default: -- /* This should not happen. */ -+ /* Fallback to generic output mechanism. */ - return -1; - } - _dl_printf ("\n"); -diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/dl-procinfo.h b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/dl-procinfo.h -index 22b43431bc..0585cdaa9c 100644 ---- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/dl-procinfo.h -+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/dl-procinfo.h -@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ _dl_procinfo (unsigned int type, unsigned long int word) - in the kernel sources. */ - int i; - -- /* Fallback to unknown output mechanism. */ -- if (type == AT_HWCAP2) -+ /* Fallback to generic output mechanism. */ -+ if (type != AT_HWCAP) - return -1; - - _dl_printf ("AT_HWCAP: "); -diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/dl-procinfo.h b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/dl-procinfo.h -index 19329a335b..d67fde368f 100644 ---- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/dl-procinfo.h -+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/dl-procinfo.h -@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ _dl_procinfo (unsigned int type, unsigned long int word) - in the kernel sources. */ - int i; - -- /* Fallback to unknown output mechanism. */ -- if (type == AT_HWCAP2) -+ /* Fallback to generic output mechanism. */ -+ if (type != AT_HWCAP) - return -1; - - _dl_printf ("AT_HWCAP: "); - -From e28ad442e73b00ae2047d89c8cc7f9b2a0de5436 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: TAMUKI Shoichi <tamuki@linet.gr.jp> -Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2019 21:00:28 +0900 -Subject: [PATCH] ja_JP: Change the offset for Taisho gan-nen from 2 to 1 [BZ - #24162] -diff --git a/localedata/locales/ja_JP b/localedata/locales/ja_JP -index 1fd2fee44b..9bfbb2bb9b 100644 ---- a/localedata/locales/ja_JP -+++ b/localedata/locales/ja_JP -@@ -14951,7 +14951,7 @@ era "+:2:1990//01//01:+*:<U5E73><U6210>:%EC%Ey<U5E74>";/ - "+:2:1927//01//01:1989//01//07:<U662D><U548C>:%EC%Ey<U5E74>";/ - "+:1:1926//12//25:1926//12//31:<U662D><U548C>:%EC<U5143><U5E74>";/ - "+:2:1913//01//01:1926//12//24:<U5927><U6B63>:%EC%Ey<U5E74>";/ -- "+:2:1912//07//30:1912//12//31:<U5927><U6B63>:%EC<U5143><U5E74>";/ -+ "+:1:1912//07//30:1912//12//31:<U5927><U6B63>:%EC<U5143><U5E74>";/ - "+:6:1873//01//01:1912//07//29:<U660E><U6CBB>:%EC%Ey<U5E74>";/ - "+:1:0001//01//01:1872//12//31:<U897F><U66A6>:%EC%Ey<U5E74>";/ - "+:1:-0001//12//31:-*:<U7D00><U5143><U524D>:%EC%Ey<U5E74>" - -From 0941350c20a52447e53c5169354408e3db591f73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: TAMUKI Shoichi <tamuki@linet.gr.jp> -Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:46:55 +0900 -Subject: [PATCH] ja_JP locale: Add entry for the new Japanese era [BZ #22964] -diff --git a/localedata/locales/ja_JP b/localedata/locales/ja_JP -index 9bfbb2bb9b..c64aaaff55 100644 ---- a/localedata/locales/ja_JP -+++ b/localedata/locales/ja_JP -@@ -14946,7 +14946,9 @@ am_pm "<U5348><U524D>";"<U5348><U5F8C>" - - t_fmt_ampm "%p%I<U6642>%M<U5206>%S<U79D2>" - --era "+:2:1990//01//01:+*:<U5E73><U6210>:%EC%Ey<U5E74>";/ -+era "+:2:2020//01//01:+*:<U4EE4><U548C>:%EC%Ey<U5E74>";/ -+ "+:1:2019//05//01:2019//12//31:<U4EE4><U548C>:%EC<U5143><U5E74>";/ -+ "+:2:1990//01//01:2019//04//30:<U5E73><U6210>:%EC%Ey<U5E74>";/ - "+:1:1989//01//08:1989//12//31:<U5E73><U6210>:%EC<U5143><U5E74>";/ - "+:2:1927//01//01:1989//01//07:<U662D><U548C>:%EC%Ey<U5E74>";/ - "+:1:1926//12//25:1926//12//31:<U662D><U548C>:%EC<U5143><U5E74>";/ - -From 52b7cd6e9a701bb203023d56e84551943dc6a4c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Adam Maris <amaris@redhat.com> -Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:51:16 -0400 -Subject: [PATCH] malloc: Check for large bin list corruption when inserting - unsorted chunk -diff --git a/malloc/malloc.c b/malloc/malloc.c -index feaf7ee0bf..ce771375b6 100644 ---- a/malloc/malloc.c -+++ b/malloc/malloc.c -@@ -3876,10 +3876,14 @@ _int_malloc (mstate av, size_t bytes) - { - victim->fd_nextsize = fwd; - victim->bk_nextsize = fwd->bk_nextsize; -+ if (__glibc_unlikely (fwd->bk_nextsize->fd_nextsize != fwd)) -+ malloc_printerr ("malloc(): largebin double linked list corrupted (nextsize)"); - fwd->bk_nextsize = victim; - victim->bk_nextsize->fd_nextsize = victim; - } - bck = fwd->bk; -+ if (bck->fd != fwd) -+ malloc_printerr ("malloc(): largebin double linked list corrupted (bk)"); - } - } - else - -From c6177be4b92d5d7df50a785652d1912db511423e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> -Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 17:09:05 +0200 -Subject: [PATCH] Fix crash in _IO_wfile_sync (bug 20568) -diff --git a/libio/wfileops.c b/libio/wfileops.c -index 78f20486e5..bab2ba4892 100644 ---- a/libio/wfileops.c -+++ b/libio/wfileops.c -@@ -508,11 +508,12 @@ _IO_wfile_sync (FILE *fp) - generate the wide characters up to the current reading - position. */ - int nread; -- -+ size_t wnread = (fp->_wide_data->_IO_read_ptr -+ - fp->_wide_data->_IO_read_base); - fp->_wide_data->_IO_state = fp->_wide_data->_IO_last_state; - nread = (*cv->__codecvt_do_length) (cv, &fp->_wide_data->_IO_state, - fp->_IO_read_base, -- fp->_IO_read_end, delta); -+ fp->_IO_read_end, wnread); - fp->_IO_read_ptr = fp->_IO_read_base + nread; - delta = -(fp->_IO_read_end - fp->_IO_read_base - nread); - } - -From e3f828b8bd6e21922da8be8dee35edef09382d8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> -Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 17:14:01 +0200 -Subject: [PATCH] dlfcn: Guard __dlerror_main_freeres with __libc_once_get - (once) [BZ#24476] -diff --git a/dlfcn/dlerror.c b/dlfcn/dlerror.c -index 27376582d0..ca42c126c1 100644 ---- a/dlfcn/dlerror.c -+++ b/dlfcn/dlerror.c -@@ -72,9 +72,16 @@ __dlerror (void) - __libc_once (once, init); - - /* Get error string. */ -- result = (struct dl_action_result *) __libc_getspecific (key); -- if (result == NULL) -- result = &last_result; -+ if (static_buf != NULL) -+ result = static_buf; -+ else -+ { -+ /* init () has been run and we don't use the static buffer. -+ So we have a valid key. */ -+ result = (struct dl_action_result *) __libc_getspecific (key); -+ if (result == NULL) -+ result = &last_result; -+ } - - /* Test whether we already returned the string. */ - if (result->returned != 0) -@@ -230,13 +237,19 @@ free_key_mem (void *mem) - void - __dlerror_main_freeres (void) - { -- void *mem; - /* Free the global memory if used. */ - check_free (&last_result); -- /* Free the TSD memory if used. */ -- mem = __libc_getspecific (key); -- if (mem != NULL) -- free_key_mem (mem); -+ -+ if (__libc_once_get (once) && static_buf == NULL) -+ { -+ /* init () has been run and we don't use the static buffer. -+ So we have a valid key. */ -+ void *mem; -+ /* Free the TSD memory if used. */ -+ mem = __libc_getspecific (key); -+ if (mem != NULL) -+ free_key_mem (mem); -+ } - } - - struct dlfcn_hook *_dlfcn_hook __attribute__((nocommon)); - -From 95d66fecaabbc92ab53027e808f0fc1929c9f21a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Wilco Dijkstra <wdijkstr@arm.com> -Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 16:38:21 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] Fix tcache count maximum (BZ #24531) -diff --git a/malloc/malloc.c b/malloc/malloc.c -index ce771375b6..0abd653be2 100644 ---- a/malloc/malloc.c -+++ b/malloc/malloc.c -@@ -2919,6 +2919,8 @@ typedef struct tcache_perthread_struct - tcache_entry *entries[TCACHE_MAX_BINS]; - } tcache_perthread_struct; - -+#define MAX_TCACHE_COUNT 127 /* Maximum value of counts[] entries. */ -+ - static __thread bool tcache_shutting_down = false; - static __thread tcache_perthread_struct *tcache = NULL; - -@@ -5124,8 +5126,11 @@ static inline int - __always_inline - do_set_tcache_count (size_t value) - { -- LIBC_PROBE (memory_tunable_tcache_count, 2, value, mp_.tcache_count); -- mp_.tcache_count = value; -+ if (value <= MAX_TCACHE_COUNT) -+ { -+ LIBC_PROBE (memory_tunable_tcache_count, 2, value, mp_.tcache_count); -+ mp_.tcache_count = value; -+ } - return 1; - } - -From 34fb5f61d3c3f4b8fc616ea259fa19168b58ecd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> -Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 01:20:51 +0000 -Subject: [PATCH] libio: do not attempt to free wide buffers of legacy streams - [BZ #24228] -diff --git a/libio/genops.c b/libio/genops.c -index 2a0d9b81df..11a15549e8 100644 ---- a/libio/genops.c -+++ b/libio/genops.c -@@ -789,9 +789,16 @@ _IO_unbuffer_all (void) - - for (fp = (FILE *) _IO_list_all; fp; fp = fp->_chain) - { -+ int legacy = 0; -+ -+#if SHLIB_COMPAT (libc, GLIBC_2_0, GLIBC_2_1) -+ if (__glibc_unlikely (_IO_vtable_offset (fp) != 0)) -+ legacy = 1; -+#endif -+ - if (! (fp->_flags & _IO_UNBUFFERED) - /* Iff stream is un-orientated, it wasn't used. */ -- && fp->_mode != 0) -+ && (legacy || fp->_mode != 0)) - { - #ifdef _IO_MTSAFE_IO - int cnt; -@@ -805,7 +812,7 @@ _IO_unbuffer_all (void) - __sched_yield (); - #endif - -- if (! dealloc_buffers && !(fp->_flags & _IO_USER_BUF)) -+ if (! legacy && ! dealloc_buffers && !(fp->_flags & _IO_USER_BUF)) - { - fp->_flags |= _IO_USER_BUF; - -@@ -816,7 +823,7 @@ _IO_unbuffer_all (void) - - _IO_SETBUF (fp, NULL, 0); - -- if (fp->_mode > 0) -+ if (! legacy && fp->_mode > 0) - _IO_wsetb (fp, NULL, NULL, 0); - - #ifdef _IO_MTSAFE_IO -@@ -827,7 +834,8 @@ _IO_unbuffer_all (void) - - /* Make sure that never again the wide char functions can be - used. */ -- fp->_mode = -1; -+ if (! legacy) -+ fp->_mode = -1; - } - - #ifdef _IO_MTSAFE_IO - |